Voting Rules for  Accurate
Democracy
Different jobs for voting need different types of voting.
Statistics on Proportional Representation, electing women and quality of life

Statistics by Country

Quotations about Proportional Representation
The table below shows how much voting rules influence several measures of democracy.  The newer page shows fewer countries, but it lets you sort more recent voter-turnout statistics by national voting rule, election of women and policy results.

Column 2 gives the voting Rule that elects the country's lower house.
"PR" countries use a form of proportional representation.
"SWD" countries use winner-take-all, single-winner districts.
"MMP" systems elect a mix of reps by PR and SWD, usually plurality.

The Turnout of voters is a measure of their motivation to participate. The best voting rules for accurate democracy tend to increase voter turnout.

Women shows the percentage of legislative seats won by women.

IRV= single-seat districts using Instant Runoff or Alternative Vote.
Plurality= single-seat districts that do not require a majority.

Country Rule Voter Turnout Women Math Score Date Notes
Australia SWD   15% ___ IRV
Austria PR 86% 27% ___
Belgium PR 93% 12% ___1
Bulgaria PR   13% 10/91
Canada Commons SWD   18%   
Costa Rica PR   16% 12/92
Czech Rep. PR   15% 6/98
Denmark PR 83% 37% 3/98
Estonia PR   13% 9/92
Finland PR 72% 33% ___
France SWD 65% 10% ___3 Runoff
Germany PR 78% 39% 10/94 50% PR
Germany SWD 78% 13% 10/94 50% PR
Greece PR 77% 5% 4/90
Hungary MMP   7% 4/90 Runoff
Iceland PR 86% 25% ___1
Ireland PR 69% 14% ___2 STV
Italy MMP 89% 15% 3/94 **
Latvia PR   14% 12/93
Lithuania PR   7% 11/92
Luxembourg PR 87% 20%   
Netherlands PR 80% 29% 9/89
New Zealand PR 83% 45% 1996
New Zealand SWD 83% 15% 1996
Norway PR 83% 39% ___9
Poland PR   10% 10/91
Portugal PR 68% 13% ___1
Russia MMP   13% 12/93 *
Slovakia PR   18% 12/92
South Africa PR   25% 4/94
Spain PR 70% 25% ___3
Sweden PR 86% 40% ___4
Switzerland PR 47% 21% 10/91
Turkey PR 92%    
UK Commons SWD 76% 9% 4/92 Plurality
USA House SWD 38% 12% 11/94 Plurality

The most unusual case is Australia. Its lower house has the highest percentage of women for any SWD legislature, 22.3%. It uses STV for 1 winner which Australians call "Alternative Vote" and Americans call "Instant Runoff". As those names imply it 1) lets a voter rank many candidates and 2) combines the primary and general elections so there are often more than 2 important candidates; this encourages voter participation; turnout is about 90% ('though voting, like taxes and jury duty is mandatory for citizens.)

Australia's upper chamber is elected by multi-winner STV. Each province returns 5 senators. This filled 32.9% of the seats with women after the October 1998 election. The women's share of seats might be even higher is there were more than 5 seats in each district but 1) 33% compares well with other countries and voting rules and 2) more seats lead to more candidates which lead to longer, more difficult ballots for voters.

Ireland also uses multi-winner STV but most districts return only 3 or 4 reps.

Turnout and representation by women may be influenced by variables other than voting rules:

The newer constitutions are more likely it is to use PR.

But the age of the democracy does not correlate with accurate democracy because the oldest democracies (UK, USA) have not modernized and the newest democracies have not yet stabilized.

Language and culture, particularly religion, education of women,

Latitude: The accuracy of democracy correlates with distance from the Equator. Even within a cultural region such as Europe or within 1 country. There are exceptions such as Costa Rica. But latitude can not explain why PR is 3 times more likely to elect women within a single country such as Germany or New Zealand.

Sources: FairVote the Center for Voting and Democracy, and the Inter-Parliamentary Union.

The newer page shows fewer countries, but it lets you sort more recent voter-turnout statistics by national voting rule, election of women and policy results   PR quotes